Hello,

Is there any reason that the check-sum file for  a multipleoutput's
collectors is empty?

-k

On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 4:26 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> multiple mappers mean multiple jobs, which means you'll have to run 2
> jobs on the same data, with the MultipleOutputs and
> MultipleOutputFormat you can do that in one pass form a single Mapper.
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 3:26 AM, Khanh Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thank you very much. Someone suggested I could just use multiple
>> mapper. Would that work better (easier?) ?
>>
>> -k
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>> wrote:
>>> check MultipleOutputFormat and MultipleOutputs (this has been
>>> committed to the trunk last week)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Khanh Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Is it possible to have more than one output collector for one map?
>>>>
>>>> My input are records of html pages. I am mapping each url to its
>>>> html-content and want to have two output collectors. One that maps
>>>> each <url, html-content> --> <url, outlinks> and another one that map
>>>> <url, html-content> to something else (difficult to explain).
>>>>
>>>> Please help. Thanks
>>>>
>>>> -k
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to