On 8/12/08 12:07 PM, "lohit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> - why RAID5? >> - If running RAID 5, why is this necessary? > Not absolute necessary. I'd be afraid of the write penalty of RAID5 vs, say, RAID10 or even just plain RAID1. For the record, I don't think we have any production systems except maybe one that uses any sort of RAID methods on the name node. I'm sure Steve will pop up at some point and explain his reasoning on this one. ;)
- NameNode hardware specs Manish Shah
- Re: NameNode hardware specs lohit
- Re: NameNode hardware specs Manish Shah
- Re: NameNode hardware specs Allen Wittenauer
- Random block placement John DeTreville
- Re: NameNode hardware specs Steve Loughran