Rietveld is no longer an option as our fork of the project is unmaintained (it was one of the key reasons we even started this process).
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016, 10:28 Stefan Krah <skrah.temporar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently@...> writes: > > I guess I'd missed this point. In my opinion, code review in Github is > unpleasant for anything but small PRs and even for those when there's much > back-and-forth. At work we switched to Github. We moved code review off > to > reviewboard a few months later. Setting up the webhooks between the two > wasn't hard and code review was a much better experience. Just my 2c. > > Agreed. Our current Rietveld setup is superior and much less distracting. > > Like the Rietveld house vs. Victorian architecture. > > > Stefan Krah > _______________________________________________ > core-workflow mailing list > core-workflow@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow > This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: > https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
_______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
