On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 at 14:19 Eric Snow <ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > > Day 1 summary > > ============ > > > > Decisions made > > ----------------------- > > > > Open issues > > ------------------- > > And a couple things that we are punting on: > > * code review tool (if GH proves undesirable) > Well, that's implicit if we find GitHub doesn't work for us for code review. I don't think it requires explicitly calling it out. > * separate (sub)repos for docs/tutorials--they could have a less > restricted workflow than the rest of the cpython repo, a la the > devguide > Sure, it can be mentioned. > > Both of these can wait until later, though they still deserve mention > in the PEP. You really don't like GitHub's review tool, huh? ;)
_______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
