On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Berker Peksağ <berker.pek...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I was at linux.conf.au 2016 last week, and one of the presentations >> was from Mozilla's Emily Dunham on some of the infrastructure >> automation they use with Rust and other GitHub based projects: >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIageYT0Vgg > > I just watched it, great talk. Thanks for sharing! > >> In addition to their merge bot project homu (which we've talked about >> previously), they also have: >> >> highfive (a greeter bot): https://github.com/nrc/highfive > > This is a good idea. > >> starters (an issue curator): https://starters.servo.org/ >> >> While these wouldn't necessarily be something we wanted to set up >> immediately, it likely makes a lot of sense to try to share the tool >> maintenance load with Mozilla rather than going for a completely >> custom setup. > > The biggest problem of these tools is that they don't provide an API > or a framework to use as a base. They have a lot of project specific > code and they don't work on Python 3. So you'll need to write your own > code anyway. We are going to write a lot of bots in the next months so > I think we will eventually create some sort of framework to share some > code.
Talking from the position of owning a similar bot in OpenShift, I quite certain that it's really hard to have common base. Since these bots address specific project and there are not two exactly the same projects with exactly the same workflow. I think what Nick meant to show is, what we should target, more or less at least. > Coordinating with Mozilla (or any other organization) requires a big > amount of time, and I simply don't have enough time and motivation > right now. However, I'm planning to send an email to the > django-developers list [1] when I finish to document my bot. I have a > test organization at https://github.com/fayton. See also > https://github.com/fayton/cpython/pull/1 for an example pull request > (the name of the bot is just a placeholder, Brett will give it a name > :)) > > --Berker > > [1] They might be interested since we (will) have almost identical > workflow with them (they also have multiple maintenance branches for > example) > _______________________________________________ > core-workflow mailing list > core-workflow@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow > This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: > https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct Maciej _______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
