On Feb 3, 2017, at 18:24, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > It looks like people in general prefer "bpo-NNNN" (sorry, Ned and MAL).
I'll live. :) > Maciej, can we update the requisite regexes so that bpo-NNNN is acceptable in > PR titles, PR comments, and commit messages? Two things: 1. What about Maciej's earlier comment: On Feb 2, 2017, at 16:20, Maciej Szulik <solt...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hmm... for all the #NNN in commits we'll get quite a few false links in > github, so maybe removing the # would > be valuable, or replacing it with issue/bpo. I'm guessing that's gonna be a ugly usability issue if all the old github commit pages offer invalid links for all of the old #nnnnn references. Or am I missing something there? 2. What about Misc/NEWS entries? Are we going to continue to ask committers to use the old format (Issue #nnnnn) there? Note these are currently auto-linked in the docs builds, e.g. https://docs.python.org/3.6/whatsnew/changelog.html. -- Ned Deily n...@python.org -- [] _______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
