On 1 April 2017 at 09:23, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > I have created a bot that I hope we can use to host all non-CLA checks for a > PR that isn't covered by CI: https://github.com/brettcannon/bedevere. To > start, the bot would check for a bugs.python.org issue number and set a > failing status if one isn't found, else link the status to the issue itself. > > If the approach I took in the bot seems reasonable to people I will add > support for a "trivial" label which would cause the bot to say the check is > successful due to the fact that the PR is trivial enough to not warrant an > issue to begin with. We can then continue to expand this bot to do other > things like check that there is a NEWS file (unless marked as "trivial").
+1 from me. > I don't want to role the CLA bot into bedevere since I created the bot in > such a way as to be useful to other organizations on GitHub. So the Knights > Who Say Ni will stay a separate repo. Regardless of the practical details, I kind of like the idea of having the Knights as a grumpy bot looking for a shrubbery(/CLA), and Sir Bedevere as a happier, helpful bot that only complains when it gets confused by a lack of information :) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
