I've emailed the VSTS team about it and they're going to investigate
(but since it's after hours on the US East Coast it won't be an
immediate response).
The first guess is we might have caught an update to the build machine
at a bad time. But I'll get back when we've figured it out.
Cheers,
Steve
On 23May2018 1312, Brett Cannon wrote:
Adding Steve.
On Wed, 23 May 2018 at 11:48 Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net
<mailto:solip...@pitrou.net>> wrote:
Hi,
Not sure where to report this, but I had a weird build failure here:
https://python.visualstudio.com/cpython/_build?buildId=2049&tab=details&_a=summary
Regards
Antoine.
On Thu, 17 May 2018 10:54:27 -0400
Brett Cannon <br...@python.org <mailto:br...@python.org>> wrote:
> Since both Paul Moore and Antoine Pitrou started to ask questions
about a
> side comment I made about VSTS, I might as well start a
discussion (Steve
> has also *just* emailed python-committers about this topic).
>
> Basically Steve Dower and I have been working directly with the
VSTS team
> to improve their Python support. Along the way they have
announced they are
> adding anonymous access to build logs which was always a major
blocker for
> using it in open source. VSTS gave us early access to the
anonymous access
> that they are launching along with 20 concurrent builders which
is more
> than what we currently have on Travis and AppVeyor.
>
> At this point Steve has added the appropriate YAML files in the .vsts
> directory that control the build jobs so we can test out the
integration
> and see what the performance is like. But based on what we have
been seeing
> there will be no queue in getting PRs tested and that applies to
Windows,
> macOS, and Linux (IOW better coverage and no more issues about
performance
> or having to wait too long for CI to go green ;) . There is also
other
> benefits like making at least Windows builds easier to release as
signing
> those builds can now be automated.
>
> My expectation is that once we are convinced that the VSTS builds are
> passing consistently and everything is working as everyone wants
for e.g. a
> week, we can plan to turn off Travis and AppVeyor for master and 3.x
> branches (no one wants to bother with trying to get 2.7 to work
on this and
> we can simply continue to rely on Travis and AppVeyor as
necessary for the
> next 18 months). I don't think we want to run multiple CIs
indefinitely on
> the same branch as it does take time and effort to keep CI green on a
> provider since they all have their own quirks.
>
> I should also mention that this free access is not limited to
just CPython
> and any project can get free accounts and credits now, you just
have to
> talk to Steve about getting in on the anonymous access before it
launches
> to the general public (I have no timeline on when that's happening).
>
_______________________________________________
core-workflow mailing list -- core-workflow@python.org
<mailto:core-workflow@python.org>
To unsubscribe send an email to core-workflow-le...@python.org
<mailto:core-workflow-le...@python.org>
https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/core-workflow.python.org/
This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct:
https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
_______________________________________________
core-workflow mailing list -- core-workflow@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to core-workflow-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/core-workflow.python.org/
This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct:
https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
