On Sat, 15 Sep 2018 09:08:12 -0700 Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > Thinking to the future, eh? 😉 > > While I don't have a fundamental objection, what does this get you that an > issue doesn't? Since the code will be sitting in your fork for that length > it wont be lost. Is it to make it easier to keep it synced and tested for > the next year?
PRs can be nice for CI or to allow other people to review work in progress code. But I don't exactly see the point of a dedicated tag either, you can just add "[DO NOT MERGE]" at the beginning of the PR title and hopefully everyone will understand... except the bot? ;-) Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list -- core-workflow@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to core-workflow-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/core-workflow.python.org/ This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
