On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 13:38, Chen KunYu <xspiritu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Even after reducing the code checked, there will still be mostly false > positives. > High frequency of updating dictionary.txt (false positive typo).
If you can work out a way to integrate the Sphinx object inventory and glossary that the Docs build process emits, you may be able to dramatically cut down on the false positives without having to interactively update an additional data file. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list -- core-workflow@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to core-workflow-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/core-workflow.python.org/ This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
