On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 07:21:16PM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > >These are very good for distributions. Not all distributions can > >deal with svn HEAD and few do it well IMO. > > What would be the problem with a version "r3065"? I doubt any > distributions would have a problem with that.
Yeah, fixed svn rev versions can work like any other versions. I would drop r though, at least Gentoo has a problem with non-numeric versions. (Yes, that sucks.) > >>but maybe one tarball per svn revision > > > >Would definately be a good thing! > > These can be generated using viewvc. I don't want to create > another binary graveyard for millions of 0s and 1s ;-) > > I am even thinking of getting rid of the tarballs, replacing them > by viewvc links. The reason I did not is that viewvc does not honor > the +x bit of files in the repo, so the tree migh Hm - causing a problem for directories, or where? > >For the longer term I'd like a config file for flashrom that is > >all that ever really changes unless a new bus comes along. > > ie. describing all the flash chips? I agree. Not just flash, but also how to reach them. I expect other superios to require different tricks than IT8716, so once we have a few more SPI boards we'll also want to teach flashrom which mainboard uses which superio. (By re-using information from coreboot.) Ideally flashrom would then work out whatever it needs to go through the needed hardware on it's own. This code might even come back into coreboot - for panic room flashing. //Peter -- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
