On 25.01.2008 19:17, ron minnich wrote: > On Jan 25, 2008 10:15 AM, Jordan Crouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Hmm - probably the right move, but the changes in buildrom are not >> trivial for v2. We would need to figure out what the ROM size is (by greping >> Config.lb, probably), compress the VSA, calculate the difference and >> pad. Its not impossible, but there is lots that can go wrong if we >> are not careful. >> > > We need a VSA.v3 and leave the old one as before. VSA.v3 is just the > uncompressed VSA. >
Fully agreed. Maybe pick another name (VSA.uncompressed or VSA.corebootv3.uncompressed), but let's simply add another download option, this time suited for v3. IIRC the VSA for v3 may also use some v3 infrastructure and be incompatible to v2 by definition. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
