On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 02:53:49PM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > > Should we really have a Mail-Followup-To header? > > The Mail-Followup-To header appears in all mails from you to the > list, in all mails from Ward and in one fourth of the mails from > Stefan. The mails I got from you which did not go via the list do > not have the header.
Indeed. > > I believe it is what makes my mutt reply command send messages only > > to the list and never to the original poster - which hasn't happened > > before. For replying to the list there's an awesome list-reply > > command. > > > > Is the intent of Mail-Followup-To the same as for Reply-To - to help > > people with non-list-aware mailers to always send messages to the > > list? In that case I would like to ask that it is removed, elitist as > > that may seem. > > > > If instead my mutt config is just all broken please let me know. > > (But it has worked very well so far.) > > Unfortunately, it seems that your mailer (or a filter on your side) > inserts the Mail-Followup-To header in the mails you receive and in > the mails you send... Quite right. Mutt adds it by default for subscribed lists. Good discussion at http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html and it's actually not a bad thing. Also it was not the cause of my mistake. I noticed there was a Reply-To header (with the list address) in Andreas' message (but not in messages from others) and that's what steered me and mutt off track. Sorry for the noise. //Peter -- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
