On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 02:20:06PM -0700, Myles Watson wrote: > This patch changes all rom names that aren't coreboot.rom in Config.lb files. > > I think that since the directory specifies the architecture and the > board, it is redundant information to name it something else, and it > makes it more difficult to automate the build process (buildrom).
Great. > In buildrom we should just use Config-options.lb files instead of > patching or keeping our own. It just adds more to maintain, with very > little benefit. The correct place for Config.lb files is in the > coreboot-v2 tree. > > The next patch would add Config-lab.lb files for each architecture > supported by buildrom. That would work - but what about other payloads? Maybe we could use a naming scheme like Config-buildrom-$(PAYLOAD).lb and then make buildrom look for such a file, perhaps falling back to the generic Config.lb file if it does not exist? Thanks, Ward. -- Ward Vandewege <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Free Software Foundation - Senior System Administrator -- coreboot mailing list coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
