Peter Stuge wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 02:27:51PM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote:LAR: Start 0xfff00000 len 0x100000 LAR: Start 0xfffc0000 len 0x3c000 <------BUG!..So what I don't understand is why only the BUG line really assumes a 256k ROM while all others assume a 1M ROM.Actually 256k would be 0x40000 so neither of the two algorithms seem to be spot on. :\
Agreed.The reason it is 16k less was that at the time this code was originally written the 16k (back then) bootblock was not part of the lar.
Stefan
--
coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i. Br.
Tel.: +49 761 7668825 • Fax: +49 761 7664613
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] • http://www.coresystems.de/
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Freiburg • HRB 7656
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Reinauer • Ust-IdNr.: DE245674866
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
