On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 01:34:29PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > I do wonder... if coreboot builds pirq, mptable, ACPI, and e820 > tables. Why not have it also populate that other bios "table" - > the 64K one at 0xf0000-0xfffff?
If by "table" you mean code the answer is that coreboot does not like callbacks by design. Otherwise I guess we have to store legacy data struct wherever they can be found. //Peter -- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
