On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 23:43:10 +0200, Peter Stuge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 03:15:46PM -0400, Joseph Smith wrote: >> How hard would it be to add a nanoseconds delay to delay.h? > > It would probably have to be a busy wait with compensation for > the current CPU frequency. > > I'm not sure what you mean, Peter? -- Thanks, Joseph Smith Set-Top-Linux www.settoplinux.org -- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
- Re: [coreboot] V2 Orders of Initialization of Devices bari
- Re: [coreboot] V2 Orders of Initialization of Devices Joseph Smith
- [coreboot] Memory clock cycles -> microseconds (u... Joseph Smith
- Re: [coreboot] Memory clock cycles -> microse... Myles Watson
- Re: [coreboot] Memory clock cycles -> mic... Joseph Smith
- Re: [coreboot] Memory clock cycles ->... Peter Stuge
- Re: [coreboot] Memory clock cycles ->... Joseph Smith
- Re: [coreboot] Memory clock cycles ->... Peter Stuge
- Re: [coreboot] Memory clock cycles ->... Joseph Smith
- Re: [coreboot] Memory clock cycles ->... Peter Stuge
- Re: [coreboot] Memory clock cycles ->... Joseph Smith
- Re: [coreboot] Memory clock cycles ->... Peter Stuge
- Re: [coreboot] Memory clock cycles ->... Joseph Smith
- Re: [coreboot] Memory clock cycles ->... Peter Stuge
- Re: [coreboot] Memory clock cycles ->... Joseph Smith
- Re: [coreboot] Memory clock cycles ->... Tom Sylla
