On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:28:54 +0200, Stefan Reinauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joseph Smith wrote: >>> Given the above, I see two possibilities. >>> >>> The first involves having coreboot build the standard tables. >>> >> >> Like I said why not just have a mini program between the two that > handles >> this operation. It could be added to coreboot or legacybios as an option >> module. The mini program would read the coreboot tables and what ever > else >> it needed and then set these tables up in a format that coresponds with >> legacybios, and finally passes the tables to legacybios. Does it have to > be >> more complicated than that? >> > > Why not have one or the other do it, thus saving another instance with > knowledge around? > Yup one or the other... -- Thanks, Joseph Smith Set-Top-Linux www.settoplinux.org -- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
- Re: [coreboot] coreboot BIOSisms Peter Stuge
- Re: [coreboot] coreboot BIOSisms Marc Jones
- Re: [coreboot] coreboot BIOSisms Peter Stuge
- Re: [coreboot] coreboot BIOSisms Joseph Smith
- Re: [coreboot] coreboot BIOSisms Peter Stuge
- Re: [coreboot] coreboot BIOSisms Rudolf Marek
- Re: [coreboot] coreboot BIOSisms Joseph Smith
- Re: [coreboot] coreboot BIOSisms Kevin O'Connor
- Re: [coreboot] coreboot BIOSisms Joseph Smith
- Re: [coreboot] coreboot BIOSisms Stefan Reinauer
- Re: [coreboot] coreboot BIOSisms Joseph Smith
- Re: [coreboot] coreboot BIOSisms Rudolf Marek
- Re: [coreboot] coreboot BIOSisms Joseph Smith
- Re: [coreboot] coreboot BIOSisms Rudolf Marek
- Re: [coreboot] coreboot BIOSisms Kevin O'Connor
- Re: [coreboot] coreboot BIOSisms Joseph Smith
- Re: [coreboot] coreboot BIOSisms Peter Stuge
- Re: [coreboot] coreboot BIOSisms Kevin O'Connor
- Re: [coreboot] coreboot BIOSisms Peter Stuge
- Re: [coreboot] coreboot BIOSisms Kevin O'Connor

