Dear Peter,
as always I can just comment on the messages. I hope someone else will
ack this patch, since Carl-Daniel is idle for a while.
Am Sonntag, den 15.06.2008, 04:53 +0200 schrieb Peter Stuge:
> @@ -427,6 +428,44 @@
> exit(1);
> } else if (!flashes[0]) {
> printf("No EEPROM/flash device found.\n");
> + if (!force || !chip_to_probe) {
> + printf("If you know which flash chip you have and if
> this version of flashrom\n");
> + printf("supports a similar flash chip, you can try a
> force read. Run:\n");
Here you say “force read”.
> + printf("flashrom -f -r -c
> similar_supported_flash_chip filename\n");
> + printf("\n");
> + printf("Note: flashrom can never write when the flash
> chip isn't found automatically.\n");
> + }
> + if (force && read_it && chip_to_probe) {
> + printf("Detected forced read (-f -r -c options) -
> forcing chip probe success.\n");
Here you say “forced read”.
> + flashes[0] = probe_flash(flashchips, 1);
> + if (!flashes[0]) {
> + printf("flashrom does not support the flash
> chip '%s'.\n", chip_to_probe);
> + printf("Run flashrom -L to print a list of
> the supported hardware in this version.\n");
Native speakers, is the article “the” correct here?
Thanks,
Paul
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
-- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
