On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 01:49:04PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Completely forking the codebase into separate projects is something I'd > like to avoid because we already have too few development resources.
Full ack. > Suggestion: After 1.0, we create > - a development branch where people can go wild with rewriting stuff > - a stable branch with incremental changes where breakage is not allowed. Nah, overkill and not really useful IMO. > I personally believe more in the incremental approach with minimal changes. Ack. No patch should ever break the build or runtime-behaviour of flashrom. That doesn't mean we can't do radical changes, such changes just have to be done in a manner which doesn't break flashrom, either in small incremental steps or in bigger patch-series which do all changes at once. But we don't need (or want, IMO) branches for either... Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org -- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
