On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 7:38 PM, ron minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Current state of tree. This all compiles with only errors for stuff
> not yet defined.
>
> Too many fixes in here to list them all :-)
> but:
> convert mcp55 over to new resource maps.
> fix my misunderstanding of one aspect of resource map setup
> Fix typo in config_{read,write} naming.
> Fix random mistakes in include files.
>
> YHLU: question: is REV F a proper superset of all K8? If we do REV F
> compatible
> code, and test for REV A-E in our coded and take appropriate action,
> will the code work properly? Can we have e.g.
> the same mem_controller struct for all K8?
No. REV A-E got DDR1. REV F got DDR2
>
> I'd like to avoid the files we had in v2 with stuff like xyz_f and
> just have one common set of K8 files.
> It's even ok if, e.g., there are struct members in the mem_controller
> struct that are only used on rev f
> or dual core, and unused otherwise. I'd like to simplify the tangle we
> had in v2.
YH
--
coreboot mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
