On 22.08.2008 05:41, ron minnich wrote: > I just realized my misgiving. You just created a new dts parser in a > shell script. We now have 2 dts parsers. So the idea is interesting, > the implementation concerns me. Could we get dtc, as part of dts > parsing, to generate this? Or, could we have an option to dtc to > generate this? We should really only have one dts parser. >
Yes, absolutely. However, the dtc code is horrible. I have sprinkled annotations all over the dtc code and I still have not figured out everything. Segher says that the current dtc upstream has better code quality, however our changes are extensive and merging will be a pain. He suggests to use plain upstream dtc and parse its output into our own formats. I have no opinion on dtc changes. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ -- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
