On 26.08.2008 00:51, ron minnich wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Myles Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> This looks like a lar -l error to me, or a load address problem. Did you >> look at the files that got put in there to make sure the bootblock was >> really 256MB? >> > > The bootblock is 32k. The bios.bin is 512k. It's just the len in the > lar that's bogus. >
LAR bug, then. Can you upload the binary somewhere (or mail it privately) so we can have a look? Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ -- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
