On 26.08.2008 13:32, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > >> Index: corebootv3-initram_fwholeprogram/Kconfig >> =================================================================== >> --- corebootv3-initram_fwholeprogram/Kconfig (Revision 821) >> +++ corebootv3-initram_fwholeprogram/Kconfig (Arbeitskopie) >> @@ -60,6 +60,16 @@ >> help >> Enable this option to make coreboot beep upon certain events. >> >> +config BADASS_OPTIMIZATION >> >> > Please use a more appropriate language/wording. While you and me might > find the l33t way of expressing yourself quite humorous, not all users > of coreboot do.
I strongly object to calling that name l33t. It was not B4D455_0PT1M124T10N. But I do see your point. How about UNREASONABLE_OPTIMIZATION? Or OVERBOARD_OPTIMIZATION (although that can be misunderstood by non-native speakers as referring to a board)? > We had this problem before; all it brought us was people > going back to legacy 16bit firmware. > That sucks. Do you have a specific example as to who had a problem with which wordings and were the wordings user-visible? IIRC we do have some strong wordings in the v3 code, but our user/config interface is not offensive at all. I'm asking because I want to know where the sensitivities are. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ -- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
