On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Forgive me, but I'd like to review this in depth and that might take > some time. I'm also doubting that the new scheme is really more readable > than my proposal from a few days ago. > ok, but I hope you'll see it is. The names of structs now have the path in them. Create statictree.[ch] and you'll see what I mean. But let me know. Go ahead and resend your one from a few days ago and I'll look at it. Keep in mind that this new stuff I'm doing is also there to support multiple links per chip -- that's going in now. Currently we only support one link per chip. We do need the inherited domain/bus/dev/fn that I put in the dtc node struct (see dtc.h) to make this bus stuff work. ron -- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
