On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:08:14 -0700, "ron minnich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Joseph Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> 
> 
>> But seriously, would asm volatile() be better than Ron,s solution?
> 
> For me the rule is simple: if it can be done in C, it should not be
> done in assembly. That's why C was created.
> 
> I feel that the c solution is far superior :-)
> 
I agree with you here Ron, thanks.

-- 
Thanks,
Joseph Smith
Set-Top-Linux
www.settoplinux.org


--
coreboot mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Reply via email to