Robert Millan wrote: > Void-ify a few return types that assume presence of a native > coreboot table (and weren't actually used for anything). > > Signed-off-by: Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sorry, but I still don't understand the motivation for this. Tell me why it's needed and I'll probably ack straight away. :) //Peter -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
