Ward Vandewege wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 01:55:14PM -0600, Jordan Crouse wrote:
Our current ROM naming scheme in buildrom is <vendor>-<platform>.rom.
This is all nice and good, but for archiving (or rom-o-matic) purposes,
we need to be more descriptive. Therefore, I propose that we move to
the more unwieldly, but also more descriptive:
<vendor>-<platform>-cbv[23]-<payload>.rom
Thoughts?
Great. I'd be happy to see a date/timestamp in there too.
That would make the string really long. I think the revision is more
relevant. A build date should follow the file date/time. I know that can
get lost but....
I guess that the reason you want time/date is for builds that use local
files and are not a svn co r###. What about replace the cbv[###] with
the time/date or other user string on local builds?
More thoughts?
Marc
--
Marc Jones
Senior Firmware Engineer
(970) 226-9684 Office
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.amd.com/embeddedprocessors
--
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
