On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger > Calling anything after disable_car() returns can only be done reliably > if the stack has not moved. You see, gcc is free to reorder stuff as it > sees fit and it could insert almost anything between disable_car() and > the call to stage1.
you're right too. In any event, I have never been comfortable with returning from disable_car(), so away we go. ron -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
