On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 7:35 AM, Jordan Crouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I disagree - the vendor ID is still 0x1002 which is technically assigned > to ATI - the kernel has always had the policy of matching the vendor ID > to the assignee of the number, not the current owner of the IP. As an > example, note that the CS5535 IDs in the kernel are still tagged with > VENDOR_NSC. > > I think we should keep the old names so that they match the vendor ID. > yep. if the vendor ID is ATI, don't change it. ron -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
