On 15.10.2008 04:54, ron minnich wrote: > return (void *) CONFIG_RAM_STACK_LOCATION; > > not quite right? CONFIG_RAM_STACK_LOCATION; + CONFIG_RAM_STACK_SIZE -4? >
Actually, that was intentional. You see, we haven't decided on the meaning of the RAM_STACK_LOCATION constant/variable yet. We could very well declare it to be the initial %esp for RAM stacks. Then again, we could also decide that the stack shall be at the top of available RAM, and that would require us to use a variable. You supply the meaning of the variable, I'll make sure the code matches. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
