On 17.10.2008 23:57, Myles Watson wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > On 17.10.2008 19:46, Jordan Crouse wrote: > > On 17/10/08 11:29 -0600, Myles Watson wrote: > > > >> I haven't looked into the cause yet, but the boot log looks a > little "funny" > >> in coreinfo. At least it's smiling. > >> > > > > Hmm - that is very unfortunate. I think we have boot log issues > - I have > > also discovered that the bootlog is apparently overwriting the v3 > > coreboot tables. This could be a consequence of that. > > > > Is there any old version where you don't see the issues on qemu? > > > Yes. I know when it was a new feature I tried it out and didn't see > this garbage.
I remember it working well some time ago. It would be great if you could do a binary search and narrow it down. I can then fix the problem. > IIRC K8 has numerous issues in the v3 startup code which can (and > probably will) interfere with printk buffers. I'm currently > auditing the > code to hunt all of these problems down. Please don't try using > CONFIG_PRINTK_BUFFER with K8. > > > We should probably change the defconfigs then. It doesn't change any > behavior for me, so I must just be lucky. I can make PRINTK_BUFFER depend on !K8. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
