On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Myles Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> - switch((base >> 8) & 7) {
>> - case 0: return "No interleave";
>> - case 1: return "2 nodes";
>> - case 3: return "4 nodes";
>> - case 7: return "8 nodes";
>> - default: return "Reserved";
>> + /* TODO: Are these fallthroughs intentional? */
>
> I don't think they'll fall through because of the return statements.
>
faullthrough is intentional
ron
--
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
