Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > On 29.10.2008 23:36, ron minnich wrote: > >> Just unshare. I am happy with patches that eliminate shared code entirely. >> >> > > Unsharing just postpones the problem for another 6 months or so. After > that, the new code will fail as well. Besides that, wasting the whole > boot block is not exactly my idea of efficiency. > No, unsharing nicely solves the problem. > Anyone thinking of this should be aware that unsharing will be LOTS of > fun, especially considering global variables, avoiding garbage on serial > and so on. We don't share in v2, and we have no garbage there. > We will need to compile code with different #ifdef sections > based on where it lives and previously shared parts of the code will > look more and more like old ROMCC code. > There be dragons.
--
coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i. Br.
Tel.: +49 761 7668825 • Fax: +49 761 7664613
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] • http://www.coresystems.de/
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Freiburg • HRB 7656
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Reinauer • Ust-IdNr.: DE245674866
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
