On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 01:05:59PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote: > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 03:31:20AM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote: > > Uwe Hermann wrote: > > > Drop the 'BIOS_' prefix from all printk() log-levels. > > > > It would be nice to have another prefix though. Maybe LOG_ ? Without > > a prefix some of the names look a bit too generic. > > I've though about that, but I don't see it as a big problem. Only > "DEBUG" tends to be misused in v2, but we can easily avoid that by > using DEBUG_SMBUS, DEBUG_FOOBAR #defines in v3 (if at all; all of > those custom DEBUG #defines should be printk()-loglevels anyway; > I think the reason for DEBUG in v2 is usually romcc/size relåted(?)) > > If we all desperately want a prefix, how about something really short, > e.g. LDEBUG, LWARN, LINFO, ... ? I'd really like to keep the printk() > lines as short as possible for readability reasons.
*ping* Other opinions on this patch? Acks? ;) What does everyone think of LDEBUG, LINFO etc.? Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
