Try this. This started out because in the kontron board ide is commented out.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Stefan Reinauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Fewer errors. The weird part: I had to move all the i82801gx south files to
>> be compiled to the mainboard.
>>
>> Why? Because the board doesn't use ide support. So you can't compile that
>> in, it's not in the dts.
>>
> Oh, the dts is not capable of marking a device unused? This looks like a
> major shortcoming. I thought we had a discussion about a disabled flag
> in the past that would allow disabling a device.
>
> But: The board uses IDE support.
But: it's commented out.
#device pci 1f.1 off end # IDE
> So, the generic ICH7 device structure is described in the mainboard dts?
> We need to mention in the mainboard dts that there's 1f,0 and 1f,2 and
> which config it uses? That's a rather generic device description
It's right ouf of Config.lb. It's how we've written all dts to date.
>
>> Modified: coreboot-v3/southbridge/intel/i82801gx/sata.dts
>> ===================================================================
>> --- coreboot-v3/southbridge/intel/i82801gx/sata.dts 2008-11-12 22:43:50
>> UTC (rev 1008)
>> +++ coreboot-v3/southbridge/intel/i82801gx/sata.dts 2008-11-12 23:09:42
>> UTC (rev 1009)
>> @@ -20,4 +20,9 @@
>>
>> {
>> device_operations = "i82801gx_sata_normal_driver";
>> + ide_legacy_combined = "0";
>> + ide_enable_primary = "0";
>> + ide_enable_secondary = "0";
>> + sata_ahci = "0";
>> };
>> +
>>
> --- and --- the mainboard specific variables are in the generic code?
not sure what you mean. Are these mainboard specific or sata specific?
It is hard to tell from the v2 stuff. I am only guessing.
ron
kontron.diff
Description: Binary data
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
