On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Myles Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:45 AM, ron minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Myles Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > It didn't work for me. >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> On Behalf Of ron minnich >> >> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 10:51 AM >> >> To: Coreboot >> >> Subject: [coreboot] patch: allow dts include files to have nodes >> >> >> >> per IRC discussions. >> >> >> >> ron >> > >> > It didn't work for me. I put the pnp devices in the SIO dts, and it >> says it >> > can't read the input tree (unfortunately it gives a line number I didn't >> > change in the error.) It works fine on the old tree with no nodes. >> > After lunch and a make clean, it now generates the expected statictree.c. As you said, it doesn't do much, but it adds a dev_(null) in the device list where the new node would be. I don't see how it solves the basic problem of PNP device allocation and dts parameter passing, but I see how it could make the top-level dts prettier. Can we wait on beautification until we have it all the way working? Thanks, Myles
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
