On 14.11.2008, at 19:57, "ron minnich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Jordan Crouse
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And you know what - with all due respect to Ron, I tend to
be in favor of that option. Stages continue to be rather painful.
Just one
guy's opinion.
actually, stages just define what we do in v2 now. We have the ROM
part, the CAR part, and the RAM part.
With the big difference that we always know where those stages lived
in rom at link time in v2.
If we go back to that, and we want fallback, we will likely be wasting
many Kb of rom space again as we usually do in v2
These are pretty much stage0/1,
initram, and stage2. We gave them names in hamburg because the v2
names (ram_rom for example) are confusing.
What would you do differently? How would you restructure it?
ron
--
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
--
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
