Thanks a lot for the help. I have only KT600 and 133A on hand currently. I can't access the rest untill the winter vacation in Jan 2009 when I go back home, so maybe I could try the 133A first?
You are right on the KT600. After hours' googling, I realize that I won't be able to find any datasheet online. And I am thinking about contacting the VIA. Did they cooperate? And for the 133A. Well, actually I'm not quite sure it is a 133A. The board has a 38L3456 and a VT82C596B but I heard some said 38L3456 is replaecement for VT82C964. Do you know about that? The superIO is FDC37M813, which seems not supported yet. ======================== 2008-11-26 23:20:17 您在来信中写道：======================== >On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:06:28PM +0800, 孙恭鑫 wrote: >> Hi, all. I have a 430HX, a 810e, a 815, a Apollo Pro 133A and a KT600 that >> I want to port coreboot to. Which one is easier to start with since I'm new >> to coreboot? > >Intel i810e should be a simple start, it's mostly supported already, >you "only" have to add support for the board. > >The 430HX, i815, Apollo Pro 133A need to be supported from scratch but >are "relatively" easy since they're older SDRAM chipsets (DDR/DDR2 is >much worse). I don't know about KT600, that sounds more recent (also, no >idea if you can find a public datasheet for that). > >I'm working on Apollo Pro 133A myself btw, maybe I have a patch for that >in a few days or so. > > >Hope that helps, Uwe. >-- >http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de >http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
