Uwe Hermann <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 01:55:26PM +0100, Sven Schnelle wrote: >> Hi Uwe, >> >> Uwe Hermann <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > Btw, can we mark all the new stuff from your patches as supported in >> > the wiki, i.e. is all of it tested on hardware? >> >> Yes, they are tested on hardware - i have three Boards here, > > OK, wiki updated. > > >> 2 with the Intel 5000 Chipset, > > Is this chipset related to or compatible with the new 631xESB/632xESB/3100 > stuff you added in flashrom? Did you test 5000, or 631xESB/632xESB/3100, > or both? > > >> 1 with AMD 760 Chipset. > > Do you mean 780 here? > > >> The reason for adding the Flash/Chipset support is that i want to port/use >> coreboot on these platforms. > > Nice! There's some old AMD-768 code in coreboot-v1, maybe you can use > that as inspiration (no idea if or how well that worked back then). > Those files don't have license headers unfortunately, so you can either
Not necessary the entire project was GPLv2. Saying it in every file is redundant and useful, but as I understand it not strictly necessary, and in certain cases very very annoying. > start from scratch with a v2 or even v3 code, or find out who wrote that > code and add the proper license headers (judging from the svn commit log > it should be Eric Biederman, GPL2)... Yep. I wrote it. The code worked well, there is a cluster or two running it. It was released late in the life cycle of the hardware because it took a while to get the last critical bits out of NDA with AMD. Eric -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
