ron minnich wrote: > On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Marc Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> i don't think that the PIRQ table was tested. The MP table should be >> correct and is the one expected to be used. It would be nice if all >> the tables could be generated from the same source table within >> coreboot. >> > > I agree but in today's world, where PIRQ handlers in operating systems > don't always do the right thing, I would rather we move as quickly as > possible to stop using/supporting PIRQ tables at all (where that is > possible; I realize that on some systems PIRQ is mandatory, but > certainly not on K8 platforms). PIRQ is only required when we don't have ACPI. Once we have ACPI on all platforms we can drop PIRQ.
--
coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i. Br.
Tel.: +49 761 7668825 • Fax: +49 761 7664613
Email: [email protected] • http://www.coresystems.de/
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Freiburg • HRB 7656
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Reinauer • Ust-IdNr.: DE245674866
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
