On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 08:01:44AM -0800, ron minnich wrote: > On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Peter Stuge <[email protected]> wrote: > > Piotr Brostovski wrote: > >> I'm asking myself if it is possible that mkelfImage simply isn't > >> compatible with current gPXE releases? > > > > mkelfImage is strictly for Linux. > > > > Upstream gPXE can not be built for coreboot, but here is a web page > > with some information that may still be useful: > > > > I'm puzzled about that. Was gPXE derived from etherboot and, if so, > why did they drop support? If not, how bad does it look to add > coreboot support the way Eric added it for etherboot?
>From what I understand gPXE is a total rewrite of etherboot, by the etherboot folks. They had coreboot support in etherboot, but it has not (yet?) been implemented in gPXE. With libpayload, this might actually be a lot easier now that it would have been. Thanks, Ward. -- Ward Vandewege <[email protected]> Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
