On 12.02.2009 17:35, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > Carl-Daniel: if you solve the problem wit an algorithm that is easier to > understand and/or shorter than the current code with 2 special cases, > let's review your _code_ and I'm sure enough people will Ack it. Don't > discuss discarding my patches with empty hands, I tend to react allergic > to that. >
Unfortunately, this patch - broke every target using CONFIG_GXFUMA (AMD Pistachio and DBM690T) - is inactive on every other target with UMA graphics and won't solve the problem there. Is there any in-tree board where the patch has brought an improvement? Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
