Hi,

The scope question was answered by Myles already.

And your code shows one processor, the original code shows four
processors (I have one single-core CPU).

I choose to generate the code just for cores which exists.


It seems that your code also fixes the message "powernow-k8: ph2 null
fid transition 0xa", but I am not sure whether this is an artifact of my
testing setup.

It imho says that it is already there. Quite harmless messages.


I tested switching from maximum powersave to maximum performance in a
tight loop (0.1 seconds delay between state changes) and it survived 262
changes in each direction. After that, I stopped the test because it
seemed to work.

Well this change just tables not the chipset setup, but it is fine that it 
works.



If you are sure that your code can handle multicore/multiprocessor
constellations and if you can explain that additional backslash before
_PR, the patch is

Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[email protected]>

Committed revision 3955.

Ok thanks,

Rudolf

Attached are acpidumps and bootlogs without and with your patch.

Regards,
Carl-Daniel


--
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Reply via email to