Marc Jones wrote:
>>> -const uint32_t msraddrbyname(const char *name) {
>>> +uint32_t msraddrbyname(const char *name) {
>>>
>> Any reason for the const removal? The changelog doesn't say anything
>> about it
>
> That was to get it to compile with -Werror which is on by default. It
> didn't look like that really needed to be a const.
>
>
Does the const make sense at all? It seems odd to define the variable
integer return value of a function const. What's that supposed to be
good for?Stefan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
