On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Rudolf Marek <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm assuming that since I have the problem on my Tyan s2895 and s2892, >> and they have different superIOs that that's not the problem. What do >> you think? >> > > Ok then. But it is worth to check if there is no misconfiguration. The IRQ > regs are on std places. OK. I'll compare superiotool output from factory and Coreboot.
>> Ah. I'm sorry I think you've tried to tell me this multiple times but >> I've missed it. You're saying that the IRQ is getting sent to two >> different IRQs and one of them has a handler, but the other doesn't? >> > > Yes thats what I think. Second option is that it is something else like some > nVidia ACPI timer, but this is unlikely becuase we would have seen this > before the changes. > > Maybe you can boot orig coreboot sources and see what device listens on IRQ > 9 ;) Sure. I'll try that too. Thanks, Myles -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
