2009/3/17 Stefan Reinauer <[email protected]>: > On 17.03.2009 15:43 Uhr, Kevin O'Connor wrote: >> One suggestion - instead of making the "floating table" be a sub-table >> of a coreboot-table, make it a stand alone data structure. As it >> stands, I think existing code might get confused when it finds a >> coreboot table without any real data in it. >> > No worries about that, almost all existing code is fixed up by now. > Also, the existing implementations are not less confused if they don't > find a table at all. The format was designed to be flexible enough to > handle any number of subtables dynamically. > > Attached is the patch against libpayload. Acked-by: Myles Watson <[email protected]>
Thanks, Myles -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
