On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Kevin O'Connor <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 01:01:41PM -0700, ron minnich wrote: >> are the payloads built with omit frame pointer? >> >> it's not a good thing if we have to sync how payloads are built with >> how coreboot is built. > > SeaBIOS does use -fomit-frame-pointer (enabling it provides noticably > better code generation). However, I don't think this is related to > the payload at all. The frame-pointer option controls what gcc puts > into %ebp, and SeaBIOS doesn't care at all what's in that register > when it is launched.
yes, we may still be looking at a symptom of a different problem ron -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
