Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Could this be something useful for us, especially considering it > looks like a combination of msrtool, inteltool etc? > I'd like to make sure we don't reinvent the wheel here. .. > http://code.google.com/p/prettyprint/
I had a chat with the lead developer (Tim IIRC) at Google. There is a certain overlap in functionality but I for one really like our approach with many simpler tools rather than one tool to rule them all. C++ isn't so hot, but that's not really important. Their FUSE idea is kinda cool. Some good some bad. At this point I think a little competition is ok. I don't think we have much overlap in hardware support right now, and codifying+verifying registers should take more time than writing the engine no matter which tool we're talking about. //Peter -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
