ron minnich wrote: > > Besides that, I agree with Peter on naming when he wrote: > >> It absolutely must get a different name. Several file systems exist > >> in Linux already with names that are similar enough to cause a lot of > >> unneccessary confusion. > > I welcome another name, but I won't accept a reject unless it comes > with another name :-)
Some -fs names I would like much better: cfs compfs componentfs fwfs firmwarefs cbfs corbfs topfs I want to avoid anything with RAM, ROM, BIOS, boot or flash because those terms are extremely overloaded. //Peter -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
